The purpose of this information is to make it conceivable for possible working group members to figure out if they will be a good candidate for a working group.
CDIO programmes are distinctive because they focus not just on the acquisition of scientific
knowledge but also on the
development of graduate skills, experience and attitudes essential in 21st century society and
professional engineering.
CDIO programmes are therefore typically built around team based active & experiential learning
activities, with a
special focus on design-build-test projects. The design & delivery of such learning experiences
requires educators with
a particular blend of skills: expertise in engineering science, pedagogy and practical /
professional engineering
experience.
CDIO Standard 9: Enhancement of Faculty Competence acknowledges that “Engineering professors tend to
be experts in the
research and knowledge base of their respective disciplines, with only limited experience in the
practice of engineering
…” Standard 9 also recommends that “… Faculty needs to enhance its engineering knowledge and skills
so that it can
provide relevant examples to students and also serve as individual role models of contemporary
engineers”. For many
years CDIO collaborating schools have been seeking to develop their academic Faculty competence in
an effort to create
the “ideal engineering educator”. For many years they have failed. Almost all collaborator
self-evaluations against the
CDIO Standards prove that Standard 9 is the hardest to make progress against.
The authors suggest we take a new approach: that we stop trying to create the academic Faculty
member with the perfect
blend of skills & experience, and instead focus on proper partnership between academic and technical
staff in the design
and delivery of teaching. Deploying these two distinct skill sets together will enhance student
learning and allow us to
target the full range of required learning outcomes.
This working group seeks to create the CDIO Technicians Network to acknowledge the work of technical
staff across our
network, and as a mechanism to enable technicians to:
• Share their practical engineering skills, experience and equipment
• Share their experience of delivering student learning; and to develop best practice and
teaching resources
• Improve their partnership with academic Faculty in the design of student activities
• Deliver a regular strand of activity at CDIO conferences and thereby establish the Technician
Network as a central
part of the Initiative.
Matt Murphy and Tony Topping, University of Liverpool, UK ( murphym@liv.ac.uk )
Application for joining the working group on Faculty-Technician Collaboration is done by filling out the application form Here and emailing it to the working group leader (Matt Murphy, murphym@liv.ac.uk)
In advance of the Working Group meeting participants will be invited to:
• Establish a local Faculty-Technician Network within their own School to work together
on this theme;
• Perform a literature survey to uncover published work in the field of teaching
competencies and faculty-technician
partnership;
• Consider the structure and content of a Technician Network database of practical
expertise and technical resources;
and to prepare their record for entry
• Create their entries into a directory of student learning experiences: activity
descriptions and delivery guides to be
shared across the Network
• Explore the creation of a series of practical engineering guidebooks, written by
technicians to support student
design-build-test
• Imagine a future for the Technician Network
The resultant state-of-the-art report will:
• Review the context for, and purpose of, the CDIO Technician Network; taking in
relevant published literature and with
explicit reference to the CDIO Standards;
• Describe the aims and objectives of the Network and provide exemplars of its core
activities;
• Present the 3-year operational plan and describe the benefits of participation for
member schools.
The CDIO Technician Network is by definition a collaboration between faculty / academic teaching staff and technical / workshop staff. The working group must therefore comprise both faculty and technician members. We have structured the activity to allow technical staff to make a full contribution in advance, but we would very much value their participation at the meeting.